home2015gs15

Question #5

It would have been difficult for the Constituent Assembly to complete its historic task of drafting the Constitution for Independent India in just three years but its experience gained with the Government of India Act, 1935. Discuss.

edited by

The task of drafting the Constitution for Independent India was undoubtedly a monumental one and completing it in just three years was a challenging endeavor. However, the Constituent Assembly was able to draw upon its experience with the Government of India Act, 1935, which provided a significant foundation for the process.

Firstly, the Government of India Act, 1935 was the most extensive constitutional document of its time. It laid down the framework of the federal structure and outlined the powers and responsibilities of the central and provincial governments. The Constituent Assembly could build upon this foundation, utilizing the existing structure and provisions, and adapting them to suit the requirements of an independent nation.

Secondly, the Government of India Act, 1935 introduced certain democratic features like the establishment of a bicameral legislature, separation of powers, and the beginning of responsible government. The Constituent Assembly could learn from these provisions and incorporate them into the new Constitution, ensuring that democratic principles were upheld in the governance of independent India.

Furthermore, the experience gained from the implementation of the Government of India Act, 1935 provided the Constituent Assembly with an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the existing system. It allowed them to identify areas that needed improvement or modification in order to create a more effective and efficient constitutional framework. This understanding enabled the Assembly to expedite the drafting process, as they were working with a clearer perspective on what needed to be achieved.

Additionally, the presence of experienced lawmakers and jurists in the Constituent Assembly, many of whom had worked with or studied the Government of India Act, 1935, provided invaluable expertise. Their knowledge and insights into the functioning of the previous system helped expedite the decision-making process and avoid potential hurdles.

While the drafting of the Constitution in just three years was a remarkable feat, it must be acknowledged that it was not solely due to the experience with the Government of India Act, 1935. The dedication, commitment, and tireless efforts of the Constituent Assembly members, along with their diverse background and perspectives, played a significant role in achieving this task within the given timeframe.

In conclusion, the experience gained with the Government of India Act, 1935 provided the Constituent Assembly with a strong foundation to build upon while drafting the Constitution for Independent India. It facilitated the understanding of democratic principles, identified areas needing improvement, and expedited the decision-making process. However, it is important to recognize the collective efforts and expertise of the Constituent Assembly members, which were also crucial in accomplishing this historic task.

edited by

You're right, it was a monumental task to draft the Constitution for Independent India in just three years, considering the vastness and complexity of the nation. However, the Constituent Assembly did have some advantages, particularly its experience with the Government of India Act, 1935. Let's discuss this:

The Challenges:

  • Vast and Diverse Nation: India was a land of numerous languages, religions, cultures, and social systems. The Constitution needed to accommodate all of these, while also establishing a unified nation.
  • Limited Timeframe: Three years were allotted for the drafting process, a very short time given the scale of the task.
  • Lack of Precedent: India was embarking on a new path of self-governance, with no existing model to follow.
  • Political Tensions: The Assembly had to navigate political differences and tensions amongst its members.

Experience with the Government of India Act, 1935:

  • Existing Framework: While the 1935 Act was a colonial document, it provided a framework for governance, including provisions for provincial autonomy, a federal structure, and a bicameral legislature. This gave the Assembly a starting point.
  • Understanding of Governance: The Act provided the members with practical experience in the functioning of a government, its various departments, and the complexities of drafting laws.
  • Exposure to Debate and Compromise: The Act's implementation had involved significant political debates and compromises. This experience helped the Assembly in navigating differing viewpoints and reaching consensus.
  • Established Procedures: The 1935 Act established certain procedures and institutions, such as the Federal Court and the Public Service Commission, which the Constituent Assembly could build upon.

Impact of Experience:

  • Streamlined Drafting: The Assembly was able to work more efficiently due to their familiarity with the language and structure of legislation.
  • Informed Decision-Making: The experience with the 1935 Act helped the Assembly make informed decisions regarding the structure of the new government.
  • Borrowing and Adapting: While not copying the 1935 Act, the Assembly borrowed and adapted provisions that proved successful and modified or rejected those that were deemed unsuitable for an independent India.

Conclusion:

While the Constituent Assembly faced enormous challenges, their experience with the Government of India Act, 1935, undoubtedly played a crucial role in its success. It provided a foundation for the drafting process, facilitated informed decision-making, and helped the Assembly navigate political complexities. However, it's essential to acknowledge that the Constitution was more than just a revision of the 1935 Act. The Assembly's vision, commitment to democratic values, and the spirit of compromise enabled them to draft a truly remarkable document that laid the foundation for a modern, independent India.

edited by

The Constituent Assembly of India, which was established in 1946, was tasked with the monumental responsibility of drafting a Constitution for Independent India. Completing this task within a span of just three years was a challenging feat, but the Assembly's experience with the Government of India Act, 1935, played a significant role in facilitating the process.

The Government of India Act, 1935, was a legislation passed by the British Parliament that aimed to provide greater autonomy to British India. Although it was enacted by the British, the Act had several provisions that were designed to prepare India for self-government. These provisions included the establishment of a federal system, the separation of powers, and the creation of a bicameral legislature.

The Constituent Assembly, comprised of esteemed leaders and experts, drew heavily from their experience with the Government of India Act, 1935, in drafting the Constitution. Here are some ways in which this experience proved valuable:

  1. Familiarity with constitutional framework: The Government of India Act, 1935, had introduced a constitutional framework that was later adopted and adapted by the Constituent Assembly. This familiarity with the framework saved time and effort, as the Assembly members could build upon the existing structure rather than starting from scratch.
  2. Understanding of federalism: The Act had introduced a federal system, which was retained in the Constitution. The Assembly's experience with the Act's federal provisions helped them to refine and improve the system, ensuring that the Constitution incorporated a robust federal structure.
  3. Separation of powers: The Government of India Act, 1935, had established the principle of separation of powers, which was maintained in the Constitution. The Assembly's understanding of this concept facilitated the creation of an effective system of checks and balances in the Constitution.
  4. Legislative experience: Many members of the Constituent Assembly had previously served in the Central Legislative Assembly, which was established under the Government of India Act, 1935. This experience helped them to understand the workings of a legislative body and informed their decisions on the structure and functions of the Indian Parliament.
  5. Debate and discussion: The Constituent Assembly's debates on the draft Constitution were informed by the discussions and debates that had taken place during the passage of the Government of India Act, 1935. This earlier experience had helped to clarify the thoughts and ideas of the Assembly members, enabling them to engage in more focused and productive discussions.
  6. Institutional memory: The Constituent Assembly benefited from the institutional memory of the Indian Civil Service, which had been responsible for administering the Government of India Act, 1935. This institutional memory helped to ensure that the lessons learned from the Act's implementation were incorporated into the Constitution.

In conclusion, the Constituent Assembly's experience with the Government of India Act, 1935, played a significant role in facilitating the drafting of the Indian Constitution. The Assembly's familiarity with the Act's provisions, their understanding of federalism, separation of powers, and legislative experience, as well as the institutional memory of the Indian Civil Service, all contributed to the successful completion of their historic task within the span of just three years.