Powered by Redpapr

GS Question

Back to 2015 GS2

Back to 2015

Back to Home

Question #

Khap panchayats have been in the news for functioning as extra – constitutional authorities, often delivering pronouncements amounting to human right violations. Discuss critically the actions taken by the legislative, executive and judiciary to set the things right in this regard.

Answer by Chad #

Khap panchayats, also known as caste-based councils, have long been a controversial aspect of the Indian societal framework. They often operate as informal bodies, possessing no legal sanction, yet exert significant influence over various aspects of people's lives, including social norms, customs, and dispute resolutions. However, these entities have been criticized for functioning as extra-constitutional authorities and at times issuing verdicts that violate fundamental human rights. In response to these concerns, the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches of the Indian government have taken certain actions to address this issue.

Legislative measures have been initiated to regulate and restrict the activities of Khap panchayats. In 2011, the Supreme Court of India issued guidelines to state governments, emphasizing that the executive authorities should take preventive and remedial measures to curb the violence and human rights violations perpetuated by these bodies. Some state governments have also enacted specific legislations to curtail the arbitrary diktats of Khap panchayats. For example, in 2010, Haryana brought in the 'Haryana Compulsory Registration of Marriages (Amendment) Act' to discourage unlawful actions by Khap panchayats. Similarly, in 2016, Punjab passed the 'Punjab Prohibition of Unlawful Assembly (Interference with Judicial Order) Act' to prohibit calls for boycotts or social ostracization from Khap panchayats.

Additionally, executive action has been taken to educate and sensitize communities about the importance of individual rights and equal treatment. Awareness campaigns, workshops, and programs have been conducted by various governmental and non-governmental organizations to highlight the significance of gender equality, freedom of choice in marriage, and the right to personal autonomy. These initiatives aim to challenge the regressive mindset propagated by the Khap panchayats and promote a progressive and inclusive society.

The judiciary has played a crucial role in addressing the violations perpetrated by Khap panchayats. Several landmark judgments have been delivered by the courts to ensure justice and protect human rights. For instance, the Supreme Court, in its 2018 judgment, declared that no individual or group can interfere with the personal lives of consenting adults and termed any attack by Khap panchayats on such individuals as 'illegal and unconstitutional.' The court has also directed the police machinery to take prompt action against any Khap panchayat or group which issues threats or indulges in physical violence.

However, despite the endeavors of the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches to rectify the actions of Khap panchayats, a lot more needs to be done. Implementation of existing laws and court orders often remains a challenge due to the deep-rooted influence of these bodies in rural communities. Many Khap panchayats continue to operate with impunity, flouting the law and disregarding human rights. The lack of awareness and education among the grassroots level needs to be addressed effectively, and stricter enforcement tactics should be devised to ensure these entities are held accountable for their actions.

In conclusion, while the legislative, executive, and judiciary have initiated various measures to address the functioning of Khap panchayats as extra-constitutional authorities and human rights violators, more concerted efforts are required. Strengthening legal frameworks, intensifying awareness campaigns, ensuring effective implementation, and holding those responsible accountable are necessary steps to create a society that upholds the principles of democracy, justice, and individual rights.