GS Question

The statement suggests that the United States has not been able to provide India with a role in its global strategy that aligns with India's national self-esteem and ambitions. This lack of alignment introduces friction into the ties between the two countries. Let's explore this concept further with suitable examples.

1. Non-Aligned Movement:

India's historical and ideological commitment to the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which emerged during the Cold War, reflects its desire to maintain independence and sovereignty in international affairs. However, the United States has historically viewed NAM skeptically, as it prefers allies who are more closely aligned with its own strategic interests. This divergence in approach creates friction in the India-US relationship.

2. India's Nuclear Program:

India's efforts to develop its nuclear capabilities, particularly the nuclear tests conducted in 1974 and 1998, have posed challenges to its relationship with the United States. While the United States has supported India's civil nuclear program, it has also expressed concerns about the proliferation implications of India's nuclear activities. This divergence in positions limits the extent to which the two countries can fully cooperate in the nuclear sphere, creating friction.

3. Regional Influence:

India aspires to be a dominant regional power in South Asia and seeks influence in neighboring countries. However, the United States has its own regional interests and alliances in the Indo-Pacific, often creating divergent objectives. For example, India's close relationship with Iran may conflict with the US's efforts to isolate and contain Iran's influence in the region. This misalignment in regional priorities can create friction between the two countries.

4. Trade and Economic Relations:

India has been seeking greater market access for its goods and services in the United States, as well as better protection of its intellectual property rights. However, the United States has been critical of India's trade barriers and policies, leading to ongoing trade disputes. This mismatch in trade priorities and negotiations contributes to friction between the two countries.

In summary, the United States' inability to find a role for India in its global strategy that satisfies India's national self-esteem and ambitions creates friction in their relations. The areas of divergence discussed, such as alignment in global alliances, nuclear policies, regional influence, and trade relations, demonstrate the challenges faced in harmonizing their respective goals and priorities.