Question #
"Once a speaker, Always a speaker!" Do you think the practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India.
Answer by Chad #
The phrase "Once a speaker, Always a speaker" suggests that individuals who have held the position of Speaker of Lok Sabha (the lower house of the Indian Parliament) should retain their role as speakers throughout their life. Adopting this practice might aim to bring objectivity and impartiality to the office of the Speaker. However, there are several implications that need to be considered for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India.
1. Perceived Bias: Continuing in the role of Speaker for life may lead to a perception of bias or favoritism towards a particular political party or ideology. The longevity of the Speaker's tenure could create doubts about their ability to maintain neutrality and fairness.
2. Lack of Fresh Perspective: Having a Speaker who remains in the position for life may result in a lack of fresh ideas, perspectives, and adaptability. New challenges, concerns, and dynamics arise over time, and the office of the Speaker could benefit from individuals with diverse experiences and knowledge.
3. Diminished Accountability: If the practice of lifelong Speaker is adopted, it could reduce the level of accountability that the Speaker has towards their constituents. In a democratic setup, elected representatives should be accountable to the people they represent, and holding the position of Speaker indefinitely may weaken this accountability.
4. Stagnation of Leadership: Regular rotation of the Speaker's position enables new leaders to gain experience and contribute their unique style of presiding over the house. Continuity in the same individual may hinder the exploration of different leadership styles and approaches, potentially stagnating the growth of leadership within parliamentary proceedings.
5. Overcentralization of Power: Having a Speaker for life could centralize power within a single individual over time. This concentration of power might hinder the healthy functioning of parliamentary democracy, as it may undermine the checks and balances necessary for effective governance.
To ensure the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India, it is crucial to strike a balance between the need for institutional stability and the introduction of fresh perspectives. Hence, a more appropriate approach might involve setting a specific and limited term for the Speaker, allowing for a rotation of individuals with diverse backgrounds and ensuring accountability through periodic elections or reappointments.